SHUH v. OAKES

No. 31468.

38 Wn.2d 336 (1951)

229 P.2d 507

M. ALLENE SHUH, Respondent, v. HARTNEY A. OAKES, as Executor, Appellant.

The Supreme Court of Washington, En Banc..

March 29, 1951.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Wingate & Suffel, for appellant.

James D. Rolfe, for respondent.


GRADY, J.

The respondent instituted this action to recover treble the amount of excess rental collected from her by appellant in violation of a regulation promulgated by an area rent director. The court entered such a judgment, from which this appeal has been taken.

Respondent rented a one-room apartment through an agent of the owner. There was in effect at that time, a regulation of a governmental agency which fixed...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases