1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Cal.App.2d
  4. 107 Cal.App.2d
  5. 107 Cal.App.2d 260 (1951)
 

SAKS & CO. v. CITY OF BEVERLY HILLS

Docket Nos. 18037, 18038.

107 Cal.App.2d 260 (1951)

237 P.2d 32

SAKS & COMPANY (a Corporation), Respondent, v. CITY OF BEVERLY HILLS, Appellant.

Court of Appeals of California, Second District, Division Two.

November 5, 1951.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Richard C. Waltz, City Attorney, Richard L. Sieg, Jr., Assistant City Attorney, Bodkin, Breslin & Luddy, Peter E. Giannini and S.V.O. Prichard for Appellant.

Wright, Wright, Green & Wright, S. Earl Wright, O'Melveny & Myers, Rodney K. Potter and Jackson W. Chance for Respondent.

McCOMB, J.

This is an appeal by defendant (City of Beverly Hills) from two judgments in favor of plaintiff. The first action filed contains two counts, one for an injunction and one for declaratory relief.

The first count seeks to restrain the enforcement of the revocation of certain temporary variances in zoning ordinances, and the second count seeks a declaration respecting plaintiff's rights thereto. The second action, in certiorari and mandamus, is to...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases