PLEAU v. STATE


259 Wis. 105 (1951)

PLEAU, Plaintiff in error, vs. THE STATE, Defendant in error.

Supreme Court of Wisconsin.

April 3, 1951.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

For the plaintiff in error there was a brief by Martin, Clifford, Warne, Duffy & Dewane of Green Bay, and oral argument by Lloyd O. Warne.

For the defendant in error there was a brief by the Attorney General and William A. Platz, assistant attorney general, and oral argument by Mr. Platz.


FAIRCHILD, J.

There was a jury question to be decided. The testimony given by the defendant must be weighed against the circumstances shown to exist and testimony of witnesses tending to contradict and impeach the testimony given by the defendant. As to the contention that there was not sufficient evidence to sustain the jury's verdict: The argument in the defendant's favor is predicated upon the fact that three lead-lined vats were in a public alley at the rear of...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases