1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Cal.App.2d
  4. 107 Cal.App.2d
  5. 107 Cal.App.2d 256 (1951)
 

PENLAND v. GOLDEN

Docket No. 18357.

107 Cal.App.2d 256 (1951)

236 P.2d 823

ELLEDGE R. PENLAND, Appellant, v. NATHAN GOLDEN et al., Respondents.

Court of Appeals of California, Second District, Division One.

November 5, 1951.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Elledge R. Penland, in pro. per., for Appellant.

Major & Tenner and Jack Tenner for Respondents.

HANSON, J. pro. tem.

[1] This is an appeal from an order sustaining a demurrer to a complaint with leave to amend. As an appeal does not lie from such an order, but only from a judgment entered thereon we are without jurisdiction to review the case on its merits. (Cornic v. Stewart, 179 Cal. 242 [176 P. 164].) Accordingly, we are required on our own motion to dismiss the appeal.

Appeal dismissed for want of jurisdiction.

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases