ESPOSITO v. WETZEL


199 Misc. 156 (1951)

Nicholas Esposito, Landlord, Appellant, v. Harry Wetzel, Tenant, Respondent.

Supreme Court, Appellate Term, First Department.

January 4, 1951.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Benjamin Barondess for appellant.

David S. Elgot for respondent.

HAMMER, HOFSTADTER and EDER, JJ., concur.


Per Curiam.

Failure to give a thirty-day notice in this summary proceeding for nonpayment of rent was not a jurisdictional defect.

"`If the landlord fails to give the notice five days before the end of the month, and the tenant holds over after the first of the next month, he becomes, by operation of law, a tenant for another month on the terms of the former hiring, the conventional relation still existing'" (Miller v. Lowe, 86 N.Y.S. 16,

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases