GOOCH ET AL. v. ROGERS ET AL.


193 Or. 158 (1951)

238 P.2d 275

GOOCH ET AL. v. ROGERS ET AL.

Supreme Court of Oregon.

Affirmed November 21, 1951.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

John D. Galey argued the cause for appellants. On the brief were Galey and Galey, of Sweet Home.

Melvin Goode, of Albany, formerly District Attorney for Linn County, argued the cause and filed a brief for respondents.


AFFIRMED.

ROSSMAN, J.

This is an appeal by the plaintiffs, owners of a tract of reforestation land, from a declaratory judgment which held that the penalty provision of § 107-125, O.C.L.A., is valid, and that the court had no power to relieve the plaintiffs from a penalty which was imposed upon them in the latter part of 1948 under that section of our laws.

The plaintiffs contend that the circuit court...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases