1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Wis.
  4. 260 Wis.
  5. 260 Wis. 89 (1951)
 

STATE v. HARRISON

260 Wis. 89 (1951)

State, Respondent, vs. HARRISON (Alice), Appellant.

Supreme Court of Wisconsin.

November 6, 1951.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Ray E. Lane of Chicago, Illinois, and Arnold W. Mulhern of New Holstein, for the appellant.

For the respondent there was a brief by the Attorney General, William A. Platz, assistant attorney general, and Martin Gulbrandsen, district attorney of Vernon county, and oral argument by Mr. Platz and Mr. Gulbrandsen.

BROADFOOT, J.

Several claims of error by the trial court are made upon the appeal. The first is that the court which fixed the sentence was without jurisdiction. The appellant quotes at length from an act passed by the legislature conferring added jurisdiction upon the county court of Vernon county and claims that only the circuit court for that county had jurisdiction to sentence her for the offense charged. The request to plead guilty, the order for immediate arraignment...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases