ROSENBLUM v. FRANKEL


279 A.D. 66 (1951)

Charles Rosenblum et al., Appellants, v. Edward M. Frankel, Respondent, et al., Defendants

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York, First Department.

November 13, 1951.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Sidney G. Kingsley of counsel (Charles L. Sylvester with him on the brief; Sylvester & Harris, attorneys), for appellants.

Henry W. Holzman of counsel (M. Emanuel Kaiser with him on the brief; Kaiser, Holzman & Justin, attorneys), for respondent.

DORE, J. P., COHN, CALLAHAN and SHIENTAG, JJ., concur.


VAN VOORHIS, J.

The complaint has been dismissed against defendant Edward M. Frankel, on his motion, due to the illegality of part of the business of the alleged joint venture of which plaintiffs seek an accounting. The joint adventurers are alleged to have been the three plaintiffs Rosenblum and the defendants Frankel and Greene. The subject matter of the venture, as stated in the complaint, consisted of two Virgin...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases