1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Ohio
  4. 156 Ohio
  5. 156 Ohio St. 188 (1951)
 

STATE, EX REL. KAY, v. FUERST, CLERK OF COURT, ET AL.

No. 32581.

156 Ohio St. 188 (1951)

THE STATE, EX REL. KAY, APPELLANT, v. FUERST, CLERK OF COURT, ET AL., APPELLEES.

Supreme Court of Ohio.

Decided November 7, 1951.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Mr. Richard B. Kay, in propria persona.

Mr. Frank T. Cullitan, prosecuting attorney, and Mr. Saul S. Danaceau, for appellees.

Per Curiam.

A writ of mandamus will not issue to compel the observance of law generally, but will be confined to commanding the performance of specific acts specially enjoined by law to be performed. Cullen, Vice Mayor, v. State, ex rel. City of Toledo, 105 Ohio St. 545, 138 N. E., 58; State, ex rel. Stanley, v. Cook, Supt. of Banks, 146 Ohio St. 348, 66 N.E.2d 207; State, ex rel...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases