BAKST v. DIAZ


200 Misc. 140 (1951)

Ruth Bakst, Landlord, Appellant, v. Gumersindo Diaz, Tenant, Respondent.

Supreme Court, Appellate Term, First Department.

April 12, 1951.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Eli B. Levy for appellant.

A. Alexander Katz for respondent.

EDER and SCHREIBER, JJ., concur.


HAMMER, J.

I am of the opinion that as a matter of law the final order below was erroneously granted.

There is no dispute as to the facts. The sole question is one of law, namely, whether a written agreement of lease executed by the landlord and the tenant in accordance with the provisions of the Business Rent Law (L. 1945, ch. 314, as amd.) and containing a provision fixing a graduated rental is valid and enforcible.

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases