1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. N.J.
  4. 16 N.J.
  5. 16 N.J. Super. 324 (1951)
 

GOLDMAN v. SHAPIRO

16 N.J. Super. 324 (1951)

84 A.2d 628

WILLIAM A. GOLDMAN AND PAULA R. GOLDMAN, PLAINTIFFS-APPELLANTS, v. SAM SHAPIRO, HUGO PRONTI, AND EMCO CEMENT PRODUCTS, INC., A CORPORATION OF PENNSYLVANIA, IN THE ALTERNATIVE, DEFENDANTS-RESPONDENTS.

Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.

Decided November 27, 1951.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Mr. Leo Yanoff argued the cause for appellants (Mr. Julius A. Feinberg and Messrs. Green and Yanoff, attorneys; Mr. Albert Burstein, on the brief).

Mr. David B. Schackner argued the cause for respondents (Messrs. Fox & Schackner, attorneys).

Before Judges McGEEHAN, JAYNE, and WM. J. BRENNAN, JR.

The opinion of the court was delivered PER CURIAM.

The determination of the controversial issues of fact by the judge of the Essex County District Court sitting without a jury resulted in the entry of a judgment in this action exonerating the defendant Shapiro from all liability on the plaintiffs' complaint and awarding that defendant the sum of $260 damages on his counterclaim against the plaintiffs. The plaintiffs appeal.

True, we are now empowered to review...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases