HAINES v. BURLINGTON COUNTY BRIDGE COMMISSION


14 N.J. Super. 323 (1951)

82 A.2d 208

HENRY S. HAINES, AND ANOTHER, PLAINTIFFS-RESPONDENTS, v. BURLINGTON COUNTY BRIDGE COMMISSION, AND OTHERS, DEFENDANTS-APPELLANTS.

Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.

Decided July 2, 1951.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Mr. Milton M. Unger argued the cause for the appellants (Messrs. Milton M. and Adrian M. Unger and Messrs. Robert L. Hood and Thomas D. Begley, attorneys; Mr. Sam Denstman, on the brief).

Mr. Milton B. Conford argued the cause for the respondents (Mr. James M. Davis, Jr. and Mr. John A. Matthews, attorneys).

Before Judges JACOBS, EASTWOOD and BIGELOW.


The opinion of the court was delivered by BIGELOW, J.A.D.

The defendants appeal from an order of the Chancery Division allowing counsel fees to plaintiffs' attorneys and directing payment thereof out of the "general funds on hand" of the defendant, Burlington County Bridge Commission. Instead of reciting the facts leading to this litigation, we make reference to Haines v. Burlington, etc., Com., 1 N.J.Super. 163 (

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases