1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.2d
  4. 194 F.2d
  5. 194 F.2d 138 (1951)
 

BRODERSON v. MARZALL

No. 10631.

194 F.2d 138 (1951)

BRODERSON v. MARZALL.

United States Court of Appeals District of Columbia Circuit.

Decided November 23, 1951.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Harold T. Stowell, Washington, D. C., for appellant.

Clarence W. Moore, United States Patent Office, Washington, D. C., with whom E. L. Reynolds, Solicitor, United States Patent Office, Washington, D. C., was on the brief, for appellee.

T. Carl Nixon, Rochester, N. Y., filed a brief on behalf of the University of Rochester as amicus curiae, urging reversal.

Before CLARK, PRETTYMAN and WASHINGTON, Circuit Judges.

PRETTYMAN, Circuit Judge.

This is a patent case. The application was denied by the Patent Office. A complaint was filed in the District Court under Section 4915 of the Revised Statutes.1 Trial was had, and the District Court rendered an opinion, made findings of fact, announced conclusions of law, and entered judgment dismissing the complaint. The applicant appealed.

The applicant claims a patent for a method of operating a four...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases