DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA v. JOHN R. THOMPSON CO.

No. 967.

81 A.2d 249 (1951)

DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA v. JOHN R. THOMPSON CO., Inc.

Municipal Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia.

Decided May 24, 1951.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Chester H. Gray, Principal Asst. Corporation Counsel, Washington, D. C., with whom Vernon E. West, Corporation Counsel, and Edward A. Beard, Asst. Corporation Counsel, Washington, D. C., were on the brief, for appellant.

Ringgold Hart, Washington, D. C., with whom John J. Wilson and Jo V. Morgan, Jr., Washington, D. C., were on the brief, for appellee.

Phineas Indritz, Washington, D. C., for Greater Washington Area Council of American Veterans Committee, Inc., amicus curiæ.

Harry C. Lamberton, James A. Cobb and Joseph Forer, all of Washington, D. C., for District of Columbia Chapter, National Lawyers Guild, amici curiæ.

Sanford H. Bolz, Stanley B. Frosh, William C. Koplovitz and Phineas Indritz, all of Washington, D. C., for American Council on Human Rights et al, amici curiæ.

Foster Wood, Washington, D. C., for Washington Chapter, Unitarian Fellowship for Social Justice, and The Washington Friends Joint Social Order Committee, amicus curiæ.

Leroy H. McKinney, Washington, D. C., for Washington Bar Ass'n, Inc., amicus curiæ.

David Rein, Washington, D. C., for Coordinating Committee for Enforcement of D. C. Anti-Discrimination Laws, amicus curiæ.

Margaret A. Haywood, Washington, D. C., on behalf of a group of twelve citizens of District of Columbia, amicus curiæ.

Before CAYTON, Chief Judge, and HOOD and CLAGETT, Associate Judges.


CAYTON, Chief Judge.

The District of Columbia appeals from an order of the Municipal Court quashing an information which charged that defendant John R. Thompson Company, Inc., a restaurant operator, had in violation of law refused to serve prospective patrons because they were of the Negro race.

The information stated the charge in four separate counts and the matter was presented to the trial court on an agreed statement of facts from which it appears that...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases