HERRMANN, Judge.
The plaintiff has alleged "loss of earnings" as an item of damages. Pursuant to Rule 33, the defendant propounded the following interrogatory to the plaintiff: "6. Specify the amount of wages, if any, that were not paid to plaintiff because of such absence from work."
The plaintiff contends that the answer to this question would be inadmissible at trial and that the interrogatory is not reasonably calculated to lead to the discovery of admissible...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.
