LOGUE v. LONG


168 Pa.Super. 150 (1951)

Logue v. Long, Appellant.

Superior Court of Pennsylvania.

January 12, 1951.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

John N. Gazetos, with him A.R. Cingolani, for appellant.

Lee C. McCandless, for appellee.

Before HIRT, RENO, DITHRICH, ROSS, ARNOLD and GUNTHER, JJ. (RHODES, P.J., absent).


OPINION BY DITHRICH, J., January 12, 1951:

The question involved in this appeal is whether the note in suit represents a primary obligation of appellant, a married woman, or whether she signed it solely for the accommodation of her husband. The latter she was forbidden to do by § 2 of the Act of June 8, 1893, P.L. 344, 48 PS § 32. The note was executed March 13, 1939, prior to the enactment of the amendment...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases