1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. N.J.
  4. 11 N.J.
  5. 11 N.J. Super. 305 (1951)
 

ERDO v. STAHLIN

11 N.J. Super. 305 (1951)

78 A.2d 303

JULIUS ERDO, PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT, v. FRANK STAHLIN AND ROBERT STAHLIN, DEFENDANTS-APPELLANTS.

Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.

Decided January 10, 1951.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Mr. John Winans argued the cause for appellants (Messrs. Winans, Crane & Crane, attorneys).

Mr. Matthew F. Melko argued the cause for respondent.

Before Judges McGEEHAN, JAYNE and WM. J. BRENNAN, JR.

The opinion of the court was delivered by WM. J. BRENNAN, JR., J.A.D.

The judgment in plaintiff's favor, entered upon a jury verdict after a new trial as to damages only, must be reversed. The trial court erred in granting plaintiff's motion for a new trial as to damages only as it does not sufficiently appear the error committed as to damages by the first jury was so limited as clearly to make the issue of damages...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases