1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Wis.
  4. 259 Wis.
  5. 259 Wis. 26 (1951)
 

ERNST v. ERNST

259 Wis. 26 (1951)

ERNST, Appellant, vs. ERNST, Respondent.

Supreme Court of Wisconsin.

April 3, 1951.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

For the appellant there was a brief by Gold & McCann of Milwaukee, and oral argument by Ray T. McCann.

For the respondent there was a brief by P. F. Leuch, attorney, and E. W. Van Dyke of counsel, both of Milwaukee, and oral argument by Mr. Leuch.

FRITZ, C. J.

During the ninety-day period after the service of the notice of entry of judgment on J. Ed. Ernst there was no service on his behalf of a proposed bill of exceptions as prescribed by sec. 270.47, Stats. Likewise, there was no application made on his behalf for an extension of said ninety-day period, if before the expiration thereof he had applied for such an extension under sec. 269.45 (1), Stats., which provides:

"The court or a judge may with...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases