SARACCO v. LYTTLE


11 N.J. Super. 254 (1951)

78 A.2d 288

PHILLIP SARACCO, PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT, v. SAMUEL LYTTLE, ET AL., DEFENDANTS-RESPONDENTS.

Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.

Decided January 18, 1951.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Mr. Charles C. Carroll argued the cause for the appellant (Mr. Dominic Cavaliere, attorney).

Mr. Charles C. Stalter, attorney for and of counsel with defendants-respondents, argued the cause.

Before Judges FREUND, PROCTOR and ROGERS.


The opinion of the court was delivered by PROCTOR, J.A.D.

The plaintiff's suit was against defendant, Samuel Lyttle, as owner, and defendant, Dominick Padula, as driver of an automobile which collided with the automobile of the plaintiff. At the end of the entire case the court granted defendant Lyttle's motion for judgment and sent the case against defendant Padula to the jury. The jury returned a verdict in favor of the plaintiff against Padula. The plaintiff appeals...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases