1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. S.E.2d
  4. 63 S.E.2d
  5. 63 S.E.2d 190 (1951)
 

ROLLISON v. HICKS

No. 312.

63 S.E.2d 190 (1951)

233 N.C. 99

ROLLISON v. HICKS.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

February 2, 1951.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Bernard B. Hollowell, Bayboro, and Rodman & Rodman, Washington, for plaintiff-appellee.

Barden, Stith & McCotter, New Bern, for defendant-appellant.

ERVIN, Justice.

The exception to the refusal of the trial court to dismiss the action upon a compulsory nonsuit raises this question at the threshold of the appeal: Was the evidence introduced by plaintiff at the trial sufficient to carry the case to the jury, and to support its finding on the first issue, i.e., that the plaintiff was injured by the actionable negligence of the defendant?

The plaintiff's case is...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases