1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. N.J.
  4. 11 N.J.
  5. 11 N.J. Super. 236 (1951)
 

SCHLECTER v. HOLLANDER

11 N.J. Super. 236 (1951)

78 A.2d 279

ROSE SCHLECTER, PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT, v. PHILIP HOLLANDER AND MATILDA HOLLANDER, DEFENDANTS-APPELLANTS.

Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.

Decided January 17, 1951.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Mr. Huyler E. Romond argued the cause for the plaintiff-respondent (Mr. John E. Toolan, attorney).

Mr. Morris N. Hartman argued the cause for the defendants-appellants (Mr. Dougal Herr, attorney).

Before Judges JACOBS, EASTWOOD and BIGELOW.

The opinion of the court was delivered by EASTWOOD, J.A.D.

The defendants appeal from the judgment of the Chancery Division for specific performance of an agreement to sell to plaintiff, Rose Schlecter, certain real estate situate in South River, Middlesex County, this State.

The defendants advance as their grounds for a reversal of the judgment: (1) the agreement was mutually rescinded; (2) the alleged parol extension of the agreement was void under the Statute...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases