KRISHER v. MURPHY


11 N.J. Super. 231 (1951)

78 A.2d 276

LALEN C. KRISHER, TRUSTEE, PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT, v. WILLIAM N. MURPHY AND HIS WIFE, DEFENDANTS-APPELLANTS.

Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.

Decided January 24, 1951.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Mr. Carl Kisselman argued the cause for the respondent (Mr. Henry S. Ross, attorney).

Mr. George Purnell argued the cause for the appellants (Messrs. Curry & Purnell, attorneys).

Before Judges JACOBS, EASTWOOD and BIGELOW.


PER CURIAM.

This is an appeal by the vendors from a judgment for the specific performance of a contract for the sale of land. The contract was dated June 25, 1940, and called for the delivery of the deed and payment of the purchase money December 2, 1940. The suit was not commenced until nearly nine years later, September 22, 1949. The vendors contend that the agreement had been abandoned by the parties, and that in any event the purchaser, Krisher, is barred by laches...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases