PADULA v. PADULA


138 Conn. 102 (1951)

LIBERTO PADULA ET AL. v. GENEVIEVE PADULA, ADMINISTRATRIX (ESTATE OF JOSEPH PADULA), ET AL.

Supreme Court of Connecticut.

Decided July 10, 1951.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

William K. Lawlor, for the appellants (plaintiffs).

Harry M. Albert, with whom were Walter R. Griffin and, on the brief, Michael V. Blansfield, for the appellees (defendants).

BROWN, C. J., JENNINGS, BALDWIN, INGLIS and O'SULLIVAN, JS.


INGLIS, J.

This suit was instituted by Liberto Padula and Guiseppe Amarose against Genevieve Padula, administratrix of the estate of Joseph Padula. Pending the action Amarose died and his administratrix, Lena Caviasco, was substituted as a party plaintiff. Philip J. Padula was cited in as an additional defendant.

Following a plethora of pleadings, the plaintiffs finally filed an amended complaint in two counts. The...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases