PER CURIAM.
Affirmed.
SEBRING, C.J., and THOMAS, ADAMS and HOBSON, JJ., concur.
TERRELL, CHAPMAN and ROBERTS, JJ., dissent.
CHAPMAN, Justice (dissenting).
The defendants-appellants on this appeal contend that the Chancellor below, in entering the final decree against them in favor of the plaintiff-appellee, misconstrued or misinterpreted the legal effect of the testimony; also there are no facts in the record legally sufficient to support...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.