1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Ariz.
  4. 73 Ariz.
  5. 73 Ariz. 151 (1951)
 

BURGESS v. HEARSH

No. 5411.

73 Ariz. 151 (1951)

238 P.2d 1102

BURGESS, Agricultural Prorate Com'r v. HEARSH et al.

Supreme Court of Arizona.

Rehearing Denied May 27, 1952.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Fred O. Wilson, Atty. Gen., Earl Anderson, Asst. Atty. Gen. (Mark Wilmer, Phoenix, of counsel), for appellant.

Ivan McDaniel, of Los Angeles, Cal., and Henry F. Colman, of Yuma, for appellees.

STANFORD, Justice.

This action was originally filed in the lower court by plaintiff, P.S. Burgess, as Agricultural Commissioner of the State of Arizona, asking that the defendants, grapefruit growers, be enjoined from violating the provisions of the grapefruit prorate program, established by the Proration Program Committee in 1944 and amended in 1947, purportedly under the authority of the Arizona Agricultural Prorate Act...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases