PLAZA v. FLAK


7 N.J. 215 (1951)

81 A.2d 137

JOSEPH PLAZA, PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT, v. ANTHONY FLAK AND FRANCES FLAK, HIS WIFE, DEFENDANTS-APPELLANTS.

The Supreme Court of New Jersey.

Decided May 28, 1951.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Mr. Louis C. Friedman argued the cause for the appellants (Messrs. Ward & Friedman, attorneys).

Mr. Manfield G. Amlicke argued the cause for the respondent (Mr. Isadore Rabinowitz, of counsel).


The opinion of the court was delivered by BURLING, J.

This is a civil action involving the conflicting claims of the plaintiff, Joseph Plaza, and the defendants, Anthony Flak and Frances Flak, his wife, to rights in lands mutually adjacent to their respective dwellings in the City of Passaic, and there is brought here for review a judgment of the Chancery Division of the Superior Court adverse to the defendants. Defendants...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases