KARPPINEN v. KARL KIEFER MACHINE CO.

No. 101, Docket 21779.

187 F.2d 32 (1951)

KARPPINEN et al. v. KARL KIEFER MACHINE CO.

United States Court of Appeals Second Circuit.

Decided February 13, 1951.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Moses & Singer and Jerome Goldman, all of New York City, attorneys and counsel for respondent-appellant.

Robert M. Rubenstein, New York City, attorney and counsel for petitioners-appellees; Harvey W. Sherman, Brooklyn, N. Y., on the brief.

Before AUGUSTUS N. HAND, CLARK and FRANK, Circuit Judges.


AUGUSTUS N. HAND, Circuit Judge.

Eino C. Karppinen and John W. Saxman, copartners doing business as Mrs. Dixon's Products Company, moved in the district court to confirm an arbitration award which entitled them to return a machine purchased from The Karl Kiefer Machine Co. and to receive a refund of the purchase price. The award was confirmed and The Karl Kiefer Machine Co. appeals.

The underlying controversy between seller and purchaser of the machine is...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases