SPENCE v. SPENCE

17406.

208 Ga. 1 (1951)

64 S.E.2d 446

SPENCE et al. v. SPENCE et al.

Supreme Court of Georgia.

Decided April 9, 1951.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Bell & Baker and G. L. Worthy, for plaintiff in error.

Cain & Smith, contra.


WYATT, Justice.

1. The general grounds of the motion for new trial are not urged before this court, and will not be considered here.

2. The special grounds of the motion for new trial complain that the judgment of the court below directing a verdict for the plaintiff was error for the reason that there were issues of fact which should have been submitted to the jury.

The evidence for the plaintiff in the court below was briefly as follows: Frank Proctor...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases