OPINION BY RENO, J., November 15, 1951:
Plaintiff appealed from an order of the court below dismissing his motion for judgment for want of a sufficient answer. At bar, his counsel stated that he followed the Practice Act of May 14, 1915, P.L. 483, § 17, as amended, 12 P.S. § 735. That Act was suspended by Pa. R.C.P. No. 1452. The sufficiency of an answer is now tested by a preliminary objection under Pa. R.C. P. No. 1017 or by a motion for judgment on the...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.