NAHAS v. GEORGE

No. 32455.

156 Ohio St. 52 (1951)

NAHAS, ADMX., APPELLANT, v. GEORGE, APPELLEE.

Supreme Court of Ohio.

Decided July 5, 1951.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Messrs. Brouse, McDowell, May, Bierce & Wortman, for appellant.

Mr. Albert F. Schwartz, Mr. Nathan Koplin, and Messrs. Slabaugh, Guinther & Pfleuger, for appellee.


ZIMMERMAN, J.

The evidence as to the existence of a partnership between the decedent and defendant is in sharp conflict. There are a number of indicia which would support the conclusion that no partnership was intended or created and that the decedent was no more than an employee of defendant. Be that as it may, the Court of Appeals found upon some evidence that a partnership did exist, and since this court does not weigh evidence such finding will be accepted.

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases