1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Or.
  4. 193 Or.
  5. 193 Or. 14 (1951)
 

LINENBERGER ET UX. v. SCHICK

193 Or. 14 (1951)

236 P.2d 925

LINENBERGER ET UX. v. SCHICK

Supreme Court of Oregon.

Affirmed October 24, 1951.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Donald C. Walker, of Portland, argued the cause for appellants. On the briefs were Phelps, Burdick & McLaughlin, of Portland.

Harlow F. Lenon, of Portland, argued the cause for respondents, Ray Linenberger and Elizabeth Linenberger. On the briefs were Lenon & Lenon, and L.V. Lundberg, of Portland.

Before BRAND, Chief Justice, and ROSSMAN, LUSK, LATOURETTE and WARNER, Justices.

AFFIRMED.

WARNER, J.

This is a suit for the reformation of a contract for the sale of real property wherein the plaintiffs Linenberger were the buyers and the defendant, Sophia Schick, and her husband, later deceased, were the sellers. The defendants Burback are the successors in interest to the title of the Schicks in a parcel which joins and forms a part of the Linenbergers' north boundary line, the description of...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases