CAPONE v. NORTON


11 N.J. Super. 189 (1951)

78 A.2d 126

MARY CAPONE, ADMINISTRATRIX, ETC., PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT, v. HENRY K. NORTON, TRUSTEE, ETC., DEFENDANT-APPELLANT. PETER PANEPINTO, ADMINISTRATOR, ETC., PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT, v. HENRY K. NORTON, TRUSTEE, ETC., DEFENDANT-APPELLANT. RIDGEWOOD CLEANERS, INC., PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT, v. HENRY K. NORTON, TRUSTEE, ETC., DEFENDANT-APPELLANT.

Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.

Decided January 4, 1951.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Mr. Louis Santorf argued the cause for the respondents (Mr. John A. Masiello, attorney for Mary Capone; Mr. August A. Azzolino, of counsel, and Mr. Benjamin P. Galanti, attorney, for Peter Panepinto).

Mr. Harry Nadell argued the cause for the respondent Ridgewood Cleaners, Inc. (Messrs. Cole, Morrill & Nadell, attorneys).

Mr. Charles S. Barrett, Jr., argued the cause for the appellant (Messrs. Lum, Fairlie & Foster, attorneys).

Before Judges JACOBS, EASTWOOD and BIGELOW.


The opinion of the court was delivered by BIGELOW, J.A.D.

In these cases, which spring from a fatal grade crossing accident, the principal question is whether the amount of damages fixed by the trial judge was excessive. Two other questions were also argued and these we will consider first.

One action was begun January 25, 1949, and the other the following day. Within ten days thereafter and before even filing...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases