SHAPIRO v. HACKEL


56 So.2d 132 (1951)

SHAPIRO v. HACKEL.

Supreme Court of Florida, en Banc.

On Rehearing January 15, 1952.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Norman R. Lyons, Miami, and Claude Pepper Law Offices and John B. Orr, Jr., Tallahassee, for appellant.

David M. Trau, Nathanson, Oka & Spaet, Miami Beach, and J. Lewis Hall, Tallahassee, for appellee.


PER CURIAM.

We think that defendant's pleas No. IV, V and VI to plaintiff's action on a promissory note alleged facts sufficient to show that the delivery thereof had been "conditional, or for a special purpose only, and not for the purpose of transferring the property in the instrument." Section 674.18, Florida Statutes 1949 F.S.A.; Cockrell v. Taylor et al., 122 Fla. 798, 165 So. 887, 105 A.L.R. 1338; Tharp v. Kitchell, 151 Fla. 226, 9 So.2d 457. Any defects in...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases