GOLDBLATT v. FERRIGNO


138 Conn. 39 (1951)

GEORGE GOLDBLATT ET AL v. JOSEPH W. FERRIGNO, JR.

Supreme Court of Connecticut.

Decided June 19, 1951.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Morris Apter, with whom, on the brief, were Julius Apter and Milton Nahum, for the appellants (plaintiffs).

Reuben Sudarsky, for the appellee (defendant).

BROWN, C. J., JENNINGS, BALDWIN, INGLIS and O'SULLIVAN, JS.


JENNINGS, J.

The plaintiffs sought damages claimed to have resulted from the breach of building contracts by the defendant. The defendant filed a counterclaim. Judgment was for the defendant on the complaint and for the plaintiffs on the counterclaim. Both parties appealed, but the defendant did not pursue his appeal.

No evidence was certified. The plaintiffs seek many corrections in the finding. A principal question arises because of their claim that both...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases