1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.
  4. 96 F.Supp.
  5. 96 F.Supp. 70 (1951)
 

INDEPENDENT PNEUMATIC TOOL CO. v. CHICAGO PNEU. T. CO.

Civ. A. No. 47 C 855.

96 F.Supp. 70 (1951)

INDEPENDENT PNEUMATIC TOOL CO. v. CHICAGO PNEUMATIC TOOL CO.

United States District Court N. D. Illinois, E. D.

March 5, 1951.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

George N. Hibben and Harry W. Lindsey, Jr., Chicago, Ill., for plaintiff.

Floyd H. Crews and Darby & Darby, New York City, and Loftus, Lucas & Hammand, Chicago, Ill., for defendant.

HOLLY, District Judge.

Plaintiff's complaint asks for a declaratory judgment finding that claim 7 of Fitch patent No. 2,219,865 and claims 6, 8, 14, 18 and 30 of Amtsberg patent No. 2,219,883 are invalid and that said claims of the Fitch and Amtsberg patents have not been infringed by plaintiff.

Defendant in its answer and counterclaim averred that it is the owner of the Amtsberg and Fitch patents, that the patents are valid and that plaintiff was engaged...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases