FASTOW v. STATE


54 So.2d 110 (1951)

FASTOW v. STATE.

Supreme Court of Florida, Division A.

August 24, 1951.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Swink & Swink, Miami, for appellant.

Richard W. Ervin, Atty. Gen., and William A. O'Bryan, Asst. Atty. Gen., for appellee.


HOBSON, Justice.

Counsel agree that the controlling question presented for our determination in this case is, "Where the language of a criminal information charges that the defendant `being then and there the agent, clerk, servant and employee of Kitty Kent did then and there unlawfully embezzle and fraudulently convert to his own use certain property of the said Kitty Kent aforesaid, to-wit: 1 Broach, two-piece, containing approximately 168 stones, 1 diamond ring...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases