1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Cal.App.2d
  4. 107 Cal.App.2d
  5. 107 Cal.App.2d 55 (1951)
 

BOBAK v. MACKEY

Docket No. 18213.

107 Cal.App.2d 55 (1951)

236 P.2d 626

JOSEPH BOBAK, Respondent, v. RAY MACKEY, Appellant.

Court of Appeals of California, Second District, Division One.

October 24, 1951.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Leo A. Freeman for Appellant.

Victor Ford Collins, Hyman Smith and Frank J. Kanne, Jr., for Respondent.

HANSON, J. pro tem.

The only question presented by appellant is whether the complaint of the respondent vendee states a cause of action in deceit against appellant as his vendor. The appellant as defendant below did not demur to the complaint nor did he in his answer aver by way of defense that the complaint did not state a cause of action. At the conclusion of the trial upon the issues which had been joined the trial...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases