PRICHARD v. CONWAY

No. 31723.

39 Wn.2d 117 (1951)

234 P.2d 872

JAMES M. PRICHARD, Appellant, v. CONSTANCE CONWAY, Individually and as Executrix, Respondent.

The Supreme Court of Washington, Department One.

August 9, 1951.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Marion Garland, Jr., William R. Garland, and Gerard N. Fisher, for appellant.

James O. Arthur, for respondent.


HILL, J.

We are here concerned with the legality of the contract whereby a widow sold her deceased husband's dental practice, including lease, equipment, accounts receivable, etc., and with her conduct with reference thereto. The question actually presented is the sufficiency of the amended complaint of the purchaser, which challenges the legality of the transaction. The trial court held that it does not state a cause of action, sustained a general demurrer, and entered...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases