CHASIS v. TUMULTY


8 N.J. 147 (1951)

84 A.2d 445

HARRY CHASIS, PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT, v. JAMES A. TUMULTY, CITY CLERK OF THE CITY OF JERSEY CITY, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT.

The Supreme Court of New Jersey.

Decided November 12, 1951.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Mr. Richard J. Congleton argued the cause for respondent (Mr. Harold H. Fisher on the brief; Messrs. Shanley, Congleton & Fisher, attorneys).

Mr. Mortimer Neuman argued the cause for appellant (Mr. John B. Graf, attorney).


The opinion of the court was delivered by CASE, J.

The appeal, brought here on our own motion following leave to appeal given by the Appellate Division, is from an order of the Superior Court, Law Division, Hudson County, denying defendant's motion to dismiss the complaint.

The proceeding is in lieu of the prerogative writ of mandamus and seeks to compel the city clerk of the City of Jersey City to provide for a special election under the Optional ...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases