SICKINGER v. ZIMEL


6 N.J. 149 (1951)

77 A.2d 905

FRANK SICKINGER, TRUSTEE IN BANKRUPTCY OF NATHAN TIGER, PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT, v. HEYMAN ZIMEL AND HARRY GOLDSTEIN, DEFENDANTS-APPELLANTS.

The Supreme Court of New Jersey.

Decided January 8, 1951.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Mr. Hymen D. Goldberg argued the cause for appellants. (Messrs. Morrison, Lloyd & Griggs, attorneys).

Mr. Samuel S. Black argued the cause for respondent.


The opinion of the court was delivered by WACHENFELD, J.

The plaintiff, trustee in bankruptcy of Nathan Tiger, sued to set aside a chattel mortgage given by Tiger and his wife to the defendants. The suit was commenced in the Superior Court, Chancery Division, by order of the referee in bankruptcy and resulted in a judgment for the plaintiff. The defendants' appeal to the Appellate Division is certified here on our own motion.

Tiger and one Irving Krause owned...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases