1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Cal.2d
  4. 38 Cal.2d
  5. 38 Cal.2d 102 (1951)
 

SELINSKY v. OLSEN

Docket No. L.A. 22002.

38 Cal.2d 102 (1951)

237 P.2d 645

MAX SELINSKY, Respondent, v. A.W. OLSEN, Appellant.

Supreme Court of California. In Bank.

November 27, 1951.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Crider, Runkle & Tilson and E. Spurgeon Rothrock for Appellant.

Edward Mosk for Respondent.

CARTER, J.

A motion for a new trial after judgment for defendant on the ground of refusal to give an instruction on the last clear chance doctrine was granted to plaintiff and defendant appeals.

[1] We must view the evidence most favorable to the contention that the doctrine is applicable in reviewing the order appealed from, since plaintiff is entitled to an instruction thereon if the evidence so viewed could establish the elements of the doctrine...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases