TANZI v. NEW YORK CENTRAL R. CO.

No. 32192.

98 N.E.2d 39 (1951)

155 Ohio St. 149

TANZI v. NEW YORK CENTRAL R. CO. et al.

Supreme Court of Ohio.

March 21, 1951.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Harrison, Thomas, Spangenberg & Hall, Cleveland, for appellee.

Paul Lamb, Cleveland, for appellant.


TAFT, Judge.

The first question to be considered is whether the trial court erred in refusing to grant the railroad's motion for a directed verdict made at the close of all the evidence. In passing upon this motion, the trial court was required to construe the evidence most strongly in plaintiff's favor. Hamden Lodge v. Ohio Fuel Gas Co., 127 Ohio St. 469, 189 N.E. 246.

On this question, much of the argument of the railroad is based upon the premise that reasonable...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases