Respondent's automobile was following the car in which the plaintiff Rose Newcomb, and her intestate, were riding, and ran into the rear thereof. The foreman of the jury in announcing the verdict of no cause of action stated that it was "on account of the negligence of Mr. Newcomb" (intestate). We regard the finding of the jury in this respect as against the weight of evidence. Testimony which would have tended to impeach evidence given by the defendant's wife as to the speed...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.
