1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.2d
  4. 189 F.2d
  5. 189 F.2d 936 (1951)
 

PALOMAS LAND & CATTLE CO. v. BALDWIN

No. 12692.

189 F.2d 936 (1951)

PALOMAS LAND & CATTLE CO. v. BALDWIN et al.

United States Court of Appeals Ninth Circuit.

May 29, 1951.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Roland Rich Woolley, Los Angeles, Cal., and David Mellinkoff, Beverly Hills, Cal., for appellant.

Wm. T. Coffin, L. B. Conant, Los Angeles, Cal. (Lawler, Felix & Hall, Los Angeles, Cal., of counsel), for appellee Arthur D. Baldwin.

Overton, Lyman, Prince & Vermille and Carl J. Schuck, all of Los Angeles, Cal., for appellees Scott, Rasberry & Hulse.

Before MATHEWS, STEPHENS and POPE, Circuit Judges.

MATHEWS, Circuit Judge.

Arthur D. Baldwin, a citizen of Ohio, was at all pertinent times the sole surviving trustee of an express trust1 of which Palomas Land & Cattle Company, a California corporation, hereafter called Palomas, and Security-First National Bank of Los Angeles were beneficiaries. On and prior to March 30, 1950, Baldwin, as such trustee, had in his custody and possession $5,488.11 to which Palomas claimed to be entitled...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases