1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.
  4. 98 F.Supp.
  5. 98 F.Supp. 1022 (1951)
 

HOOK v. HOOK & ACKERMAN

Civ A. No. 7990.

98 F.Supp. 1022 (1951)

HOOK et al. v. HOOK & ACKERMAN, Inc.

United States District Court W. D. Pennsylvania.

July 12, 1951.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

William B. Jaspert, Pittsburgh, Pa., for plaintiffs.

Harry Price, New York City, and Charles L. Cunningham (Stonecipher & Cunningham), Pittsburgh, Pa., for defendant.

BURNS, District Judge.

As I interpret the opinion of the Court of Appeals in reinstating the complaint, counterclaim, and cross-complaint in this case, Hook v. Hook & Ackerman, 3 Cir., 1951, 187 F.2d 52, the appellate court believes that this Court should decide the issues of patent infringement, threats of suits under claim of infringement, and unfair trade. As to any questions arising out of the assignment of the patent, the...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases