MARTINEZ v. ASHTON

No. 16638.

233 P.2d 871 (1951)

MARTINEZ v. ASHTON et al.

Supreme Court of Colorado, en Banc.

Rehearing Denied July 2, 1951.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Marshall Quiat, Denver, for petitioner.

Pierpont Fuller, Abe L. Hoffman, E. F. Conly, Edward O. Geer, all of Denver, for respondents.


HOLLAND, Justice.

Disposition of this matter is now made on the response to our rule to show cause why respondents should not be restrained from proceeding further in an action pending in the county court of the City and County of Denver, wherein the Honorable Howard O. Ashton as judge of said court and respondent herein, granted a new trial of petitioner on the court's own motion "based upon the verdict on the grounds of...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases