Per Curiam.
The evidence supports all the basic findings of the learned trial court, but we think there was a mathematical error in computation of disputed items. In allowing plaintiff full recovery on its complaint in the sum of $10,676.40, the court directed payment to plaintiff in full for the additional disputed gallonage not billed by plaintiff and not paid for by defendant. Thereafter, however, in calculating defendant's counterclaim on the aluminum paint...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.
