1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. S.W.2d
  4. 242 S.W.2d
  5. 242 S.W.2d 811 (1951)
 

WOOLLEY v. RAILROAD COMMISSION

No. 9985.

242 S.W.2d 811 (1951)

WOOLLEY et al. v. RAILROAD COMMISSION et al.

Court of Civil Appeals of Texas, Austin.

October 10, 1951.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Lawrence & Lawrence, and Pollard, Reeves & Boulter, Tyler, for appellant.

Price Daniel, Atty. Gen., Charles E. Crenshaw, Durward M. Goolsby, Dean Capp. Asst. Attys. Gen., by Durward M. Goolsby, for appellee Railroad Commission of Texas.

Rex G. Baker, Nelson Jones, Dillard Baker, Houston, Powell, Wirtz & Rauhut, J. A. Rauhut, Austin, for appellee Humble Oil & Refining Co.

Black & Stayton, Austin, for appellees Ohio Oil Co., Atlantic Refining Co. and Texas Co.

Turner, Rodgers, Winn, Scurlock & Terry, Dallas, for appellee Stanolind Oil & Gas Co., L. A. Thompson Jr., Tulsa, Okl., of counsel.

HUGHES, Justice.

This is a Rule 37 case.

Appellants are O. S. Woolley and Mrs. N. R. Wyatt, a feme sole. Appellees are the Railroad Commission of Texas, its members, and Stanolind Oil and Gas Company, Humble Oil and Refining Company, The Texas Company, The Ohio Oil Company, and the Atlantic Refining Company.

The suit filed by appellants in the court below was in the nature of an appeal from the order of the Railroad Commission denying their application...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases