1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.2d
  4. 187 F.2d
  5. 187 F.2d 854 (1951)
 

ZAMLOCH v. UNITED STATES

No. 12753.

187 F.2d 854 (1951)

ZAMLOCH v. UNITED STATES.

United States Court of Appeals Ninth Circuit.

March 9, 1951.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Leo Friedman, San Francisco, Cal., for appellant.

Frank J. Hennessy, U. S. Atty., Joseph Karesh and Charles O'Gara, Assts. U. S. Atty., San Francisco, Cal., for appellee.

Before BONE, ORR and POPE, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM.

This cause is before us on a motion to remand the case to the trial court in order to permit appellant to move for a new trial on the ground of newly discovered evidence.

During the time Rule II(3) was in effect such was the proper procedure and this court so held in Wagner v. United States, 9 Cir., 118 F.2d 801. Rule II(3) provided: "A motion for a new trial solely upon the ground of newly-discovered evidence...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases