1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.
  4. 95 F.Supp.
  5. 95 F.Supp. 936 (1951)
 

HOWSER v. PEARSON

Civ. A. No. 1245-49.

95 F.Supp. 936 (1951)

HOWSER v. PEARSON.

United States District Court District of Columbia.

March 1, 1951.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Herbert M. Bingham, and Roger Robb, both of Washington, D. C., for plaintiff, for the motion.

William P. Rogers, of Washington, D. C., for defendant, opposed.

HOLTZOFF, District Judge.

This is an action for defamation by means of a radio broadcast. After a trial on the merits, judgment was rendered for the defendant on the basis of a special verdict of the jury. The plaintiff now moves for a new trial. As two of the three grounds urged in support of the motion involve questions as to the admissibility of evidence, it is necessary to outline the issues and certain proceedings at the trial in order to determine the validity...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases